“Quality for me is key, and this stands true in every facet of my business from real estate, hotels, to fashion.” – Ivanka Trump

Ivanka might have an eye for the finer things, but when it comes to her namesake fashion line, there are alternative facts.

This runway season, fashion’s hottest trend is dropping Ivanka Trump’s line from department stores. And while it’s not because of her politics, (it’s always a numbers thing), liberals are congratulating stores like Nordstrom and Neiman Marcus for dumping Trump through the Grab Your Wallet campaign. At this point, she claims she’s divested from her businesses anyway, but that’s not enough to absolve her of her fashion sins.

I decided to do my own research and here are 5 (non partisan) reasons that have me saying, “Girl, Bye” until things change.

1. Design Theft.

In 2011 Derek Lam sued Ivanka for copying his shoe design. Then Mystique sued her in 2012 for stealing two of their designs. Then Aquazurra sued her in 2016 for stealing their designs. And these are only the lawsuits over shoes – remember, she has jewelry and clothing, too.

What the brand could do instead:

Collaborate with the independent and smaller designers you clearly admire, rather than copying their designs.

Photo: Flickr

2. She has a woman problem.

Remember the viral photo of Ivanka sitting at the Oval Office desk flanked by Justin Trudeau and her father to announce the launch of the US Canadian Council to provide support for women in the workplace?

Her entire brand is built around #WomenWhoWork which, “celebrates the modern working woman” but let’s not forget that most of the people behind our fashion are also women, often with limited to no advancement opportunities.

What the brand could do instead:

Start a women’s advocacy program within the Ivanka Trump brand. Give factory makers opportunities to advance into supervisory roles, access to education, maternal healthcare and childcare support. Brands like People Tree and Reformation have shown us there are many ways to extend women’s empowerment messages to the makers of our clothes.

3. Sweatshops.

If you like working from 14-hour days, sleeping in bunk beds with your coworkers, and waiting until whatever date your employer feels like paying you to get your check, then come on down to the Huajian factory where Ivanka Trump’s shoes are made and get yourself a terrible job. “We worked until after three in the morning, we then start the next day at 9:15,” said one worker. “It’s a garbage factory,” said another. Ivanka and Marc Fisher, who held the licensing agreement with her brand, have been radio silent on these allegations.

What the brand could do instead:

Most celebrity endorsed products – from Ivanka’s line to JLo – rely on licensee agreements with little to no connection to manufacturing. Made in China or Vietnam does not have to equate to sweatshops. There are many good factories in Asia. Trump’s brand should take the investigative reporting and images from the inside of the factories seriously. She could rebrand herself as an ethical fashion leader like Emma Watson, step up transparency and oversight, and invest in the safety and well being of the people making her fashion.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

4. Make America Great Again?

Did you know that nothing Ivanka Trump puts out is made in the US, it’s mostly made in China and Vietnam?

What the brand could do instead:

Create an American-made collection to close the obvious gap between, “do as I say, not as I do.”

5. Politics and business don’t mix.

Ok for real, can we not use political platforms, interviews, and events to promote a jewelry line? Let’s also not forget when Kellyanne Conway was schilling Ivanka’s stuff on TV.

What the brand could do instead:


If the Ivanka Trump’s line turns around tomorrow and changes their ways on the above, I will be the first to eat my ethical shoe, but until then, I think it’s safe to say we’re all better off investing in more ethical, sustainable options.

What do you think?

Cover Image: Seeds_of_Peace/Flickr

Related Stories

Join the Conversation

  1. wonderful points – personally i find her companies use of the tag ‘women that work’ offensive – especially as they are made by women who really toil and have no choice

    1. Hi There! You make a great point. There’s a disconnect between her marketing and how her product is coming to life. We’d love to see her support women in every aspect of her brand, especially for the women who bring her products to life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *